Jens Axboe da20a20f3b [PATCH] ll_rw_blk: allow more flexibility for read_ahead_kb store ...

It can make sense to set read-ahead larger than a single request.
We should not be enforcing such policy on the user. Additionally,
using the BLKRASET ioctl doesn't impose such a restriction. So
additionally we now expose identical behaviour through the two.

Issue also reported by Anton <cbou@mail.ru>

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

2006-09-30 20:29:41 +02:00

..

as-iosched.c

[PATCH] Add blk_start_queueing() helper

2006-09-30 20:29:40 +02:00

blktrace.c

[PATCH] ifdef blktrace debugging fields

2006-09-29 09:18:09 -07:00

cfq-iosched.c

[PATCH] cfq-iosched: improve queue preemption

2006-09-30 20:29:41 +02:00

deadline-iosched.c

[PATCH] deadline-iosched: remove elevator private drq request type

2006-09-30 20:27:00 +02:00

elevator.c

[PATCH] Make sure all block/io scheduler setups are node aware

2006-09-30 20:29:39 +02:00

genhd.c

…

ioctl.c

…

Kconfig

…

Kconfig.iosched

…

ll_rw_blk.c

[PATCH] ll_rw_blk: allow more flexibility for read_ahead_kb store

2006-09-30 20:29:41 +02:00

Makefile

…

noop-iosched.c

[PATCH] Make sure all block/io scheduler setups are node aware

2006-09-30 20:29:39 +02:00

scsi_ioctl.c

[PATCH] Split struct request ->flags into two parts

2006-09-30 20:23:37 +02:00