docs: dt: submitting-patches: Avoid 'YAML' in the subject and add an example

Patches adding new device bindings should avoid 'YAML' keyword in the
subject, because all bindings are supposed to be in DT schema format,
which uses YAML.  The DT schema is welcomed only in case of patches
doing conversion.  Effectively people get confused that subject should
not contain anything else than device name after the prefix, so add two
recommended examples.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250713-dt-bindings-docs-v2-1-672c898054ae@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-13 14:46:36 +02:00
committed by Rob Herring (Arm)
parent 26ff041e2a
commit 651fcd2552

View File

@@ -21,8 +21,16 @@ I. For patch submitters
"<binding dir>: dt-bindings: ..."
The 80 characters of the subject are precious. It is recommended to not
use "Documentation" or "doc" because that is implied. All bindings are
docs. Repeating "binding" again should also be avoided.
use "Documentation", "doc" or "YAML" because that is implied. All
bindings are docs and all new bindings are supposed to be in Devicetree
schema format. Repeating "binding" again should also be avoided, so for
a new device it is often enough for example::
"dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add ROHM BD79100G"
Conversion of other formats to DT schema::
"dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7476: Convert to DT schema"
2) DT binding files are written in DT schema format using json-schema
vocabulary and YAML file format. The DT binding files must pass validation