perf test: Use TEST_FAIL in the TEST_ASSERT macros instead of -1

Just to make things clearer, return TEST_FAIL (-1) instead of an open
coded -1.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZdepeMsjagbf1ufD@x1
This commit is contained in:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-22 17:07:20 -03:00
committed by Namhyung Kim
parent bae4d1f86e
commit 8680999dbe

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,17 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
enum {
TEST_OK = 0,
TEST_FAIL = -1,
TEST_SKIP = -2,
};
#define TEST_ASSERT_VAL(text, cond) \
do { \
if (!(cond)) { \
pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d %s\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, text); \
return -1; \
return TEST_FAIL; \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -17,16 +23,10 @@ do { \
if (val != expected) { \
pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d %s (%d != %d)\n", \
__FILE__, __LINE__, text, val, expected); \
return -1; \
return TEST_FAIL; \
} \
} while (0)
enum {
TEST_OK = 0,
TEST_FAIL = -1,
TEST_SKIP = -2,
};
struct test_suite;
typedef int (*test_fnptr)(struct test_suite *, int);